Data analysis for institutions worldwide

Evidence your institution can defend

We turn complex data into clear, defensible evidence. Statistical analysis, modelling, data quality and reporting for the organisations whose decisions have to stand up to scrutiny, anywhere in the world. Auditable, documented, and yours to run after we leave.

0
regions analysed in one national dataset
0+
countries harmonised into one evaluation
0+
analytics engagements delivered
Live snapshot · illustrative

Engagement intelligence, at a glance

Countries engaged
0
+5 this year
Live dashboards
0
+9 this year
Records harmonised
0M
+18% QoQ
Refresh latency
0min
−42% YoY
Where we workintensity · illustrative
Drag to pan · Ctrl + scroll to zoom
LowHigh▲ lowest: Morocco
Revenue by region
East Africa0
West Africa0
South Asia0
North America0
Europe0
Southern Africa0
Latin America0
North Africa0
Delivery funnellead → delivered
Leads0
Qualified0
Scoped0
Delivered0

Work delivered for and under

  • A multilateral development agency
  • A multilateral development bank programme
  • A global development agency's multi-country programme
  • International development organisations

Clients are described by class. Their names are shared privately on request, with their permission. A registered consultancy. CAC Business Name, BN 9574178, registered 26 May 2026. TIN 2623767560979.

Capabilities

From raw dataset to the decision it has to support.

Most practices hand you a chart and leave. We take the data you already have, clean and reconcile what needs it, run the analysis the question actually calls for, and wire the result to the systems your team already uses. Where a team is about to collect data, we build the digital instrument they collect with, so it comes in clean. One accountable party from raw data to clear decision.

A dashboard is only as good as the day it was refreshed. We build systems that read from your warehouse directly, so the number on the screen is the number in the database.

Michael Tobiloba Amunega, principal consultant
0+
end to end analytics projects delivered since 2017

All services

Learn the method

Build the skill yourself, in the methods we use on real work.

Practical, project based courses in statistics, SQL, data ethics and more. Start free, see exactly how the work is done, then take the full path when you are ready.

All courses

The record

Figures from delivered work, not from a brochure.

Every number here comes from a project on the principal consultant's record and can be evidenced on request. Where a result has not been measured, this site leaves the space empty rather than estimating one.

0
regions analysed in a single national dataset
0+
countries harmonised into one combined dataset
0+
professionals trained in data analysis
0%
reduction in reporting delay after workflow automation

How we work

Three steps, and you own everything at the end of them.

  1. 01 / SCOPE

    Start with the decision

    Before touching a spreadsheet we agree what has to be decided, and what would count as evidence for it. Most bad analysis begins here, answering a question nobody actually asked.

  2. 02 / BUILD

    Do the unglamorous part properly

    Cleaning, reconciling, checking. Names spelled three ways. One place recording a value one way, another differently. Two systems holding numbers that will not agree. This is where the value actually lives.

  3. 03 / HAND OVER

    Leave something you can rerun

    The result arrives with the code, the method and the audit trail attached. Run it again next quarter with fresh numbers, without calling us back.

Our view

Why programme dashboards go stale, and what to do about it

Almost every monitoring dashboard in the development sector is a photograph of a spreadsheet. Somebody exports the data, cleans it, loads it, and publishes. It is accurate on the day it is built and slightly wrong every day after that. By the quarterly review, the figures on the screen describe a programme that has already moved on.

The fix is not a better chart. It is an architecture where the dashboard reads from the warehouse rather than from a copy of it. That is the approach we take for live monitoring: the dashboard queries the client's BigQuery warehouse directly, so when the underlying data changes, the picture changes, and nobody has to remember to refresh anything.

The question is never whether the chart is pretty. It is whether a director can point at a figure in a board meeting and know it was true when the meeting started.

Getting there means the unglamorous work has to be right first. Data arrives from many hands and many systems, recorded inconsistently, and it rarely lines up on its own. One place records a name one way, another records it differently. Treat them as two things and a figure quietly drifts. None of that shows up in a chart. It shows up in a decision that was slightly wrong, made confidently.

So the work starts with the data itself: cleaned, reconciled and validated before a single figure is reported. On a national dataset covering 37 regions, that discipline is what produced analysis the client could stand behind, rather than a cleaning exercise that ran for months.

The tools follow the problem, never the other way round. Python and R for analysis. Stata and SPSS where your team already lives there. SQL, MySQL and BigQuery for anything that has to persist. Power BI or a web dashboard for the people who need to see it. And when the honest answer is a system rather than a report, we build the system.

Sectors

Where good data changes real decisions.

GovernanceHealthEducationAgricultureLabour

Honest boundaries

We are not for everyone, and that is the point.

A good fit if

  • The figure will be scrutinised, and it has to hold up under scrutiny.
  • The data is spread across systems that disagree with each other.
  • You need the system to keep running after the consultant leaves.
  • You would rather hear an uncomfortable finding early than late.

Probably not if

  • You need a number that supports a conclusion already reached.
  • You want every metric on one dashboard, with no clear owner.
  • The deadline is tomorrow and the data does not exist yet.
  • Price is the only thing being compared.

Due diligence

What procurement asks before they engage us.

Who actually does the work?
Michael Tobiloba Amunega, the principal consultant, with specialists brought in where a project needs them. He holds a BSc in Demography and Social Statistics from Obafemi Awolowo University and a National Diploma in Statistics. You will not be sold by a senior person and delivered by a junior one.
Have you handled work at national scale before?
Yes. Analysis of a national disability-inclusion dataset covering 37 regions, run in Stata and feeding national policy decisions. Data analysis for a multi-country programme that harmonised datasets from more than 20 countries, informing funding allocation. Decision dashboards for a multilateral development agency, reading directly from the client's warehouse.
Can you work with our existing data warehouse?
That is the preferred approach. For a multilateral development agency we connected the monitoring dashboard directly to the client's Google BigQuery warehouse, so the system reads live rather than from an exported copy. We also work with SQL Server, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and the Google Sheets and Excel estates that most programmes actually run on.
What do we own at the end?
Everything. The cleaned dataset, the analysis code, the queries, the documentation, the dashboard and its refresh pipeline. Intellectual property transfers on final payment. Nothing about the system should depend on us still being around, and we write the handover documentation on that assumption.
Why will you not name most of your clients?
Because publishing an organisation's name without written sign off is a governance failure, and a procurement reviewer treats it as one. Every client is described by class, and we share names privately on request once we have their permission. We will extend you the same discretion.
How do payments work?
A deposit when the scope is signed, the balance on delivery and acceptance. Larger projects run on three milestones. You never pay for work you have not seen, and scope changes go through a written change request so neither side is surprised by an invoice.
Can you work with data containing personal information?
Yes, and it is routine on survey work. Identifiers are masked, sensitive fields are generalised, and access is scoped to who needs it. Data protection rules carry specific obligations, and we will tell you plainly where you need a professional legal opinion rather than ours.
What if the data cannot answer our question?
We tell you early, and set out what would be needed to answer it. That is usually cheaper than the alternative, which is a confident finding built on a dataset that could never have supported it. It has cost us engagements. It has never cost us a client twice.

Have a problem worth solving?

Tell us what you are working with and what decision it has to support. If we are not the right fit, we will say that too, and point you at someone who is.

Start a project